• Users Online: 320
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 352-356

Topical Minoxidil Solution-Induced Central Toxic Keratopathy following Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Case Study


1 Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Hoopes Vision Research Center, Draper; John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA

Date of Submission01-Dec-2021
Date of Decision16-Mar-2022
Date of Acceptance04-Apr-2022
Date of Web Publication30-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Mohsen Heirani
Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Qazvin Square, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joco.joco_342_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To report the clinical findings of unilateral central toxic keratopathy (CTK) associated with inadvertent exposure to topical minoxidil 5% solution 1 day after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Methods: Anterior segment slit-lamp photography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), pachymetry map, epithelial map, and manifest refractions were recorded.
Results: This is a case of a 27-year-old male who underwent bilateral PRK and presented 5 days after surgery with the complaint of acute decreased visual acuity in the left eye (LE). His LE was reportedly exposed to topical ethanol-based minoxidil 5% on postoperative day 1, which he was using as a posthair transplant treatment. Clinical examination showed hyperopic shift, poor visual acuity, central corneal opacity, epithelial irregularity, central corneal thinning, and flattening on AS-OCT. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of CTK. The patient was monitored with conservative treatment and demonstrated full recovery after 6 months.
Conclusion: It is recommended to warn patients who have undergone refractive surgery concerning the use of ethanol-containing agents, such as minoxidil solution, because of the possible risk of CTK, a complication not formally recognized.

Keywords: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography, Central toxic keratopathy, Photorefractive keratectomy


How to cite this article:
Mohammadpour M, Khorrami-Nejad M, Heirani M, Moshirfar M. Topical Minoxidil Solution-Induced Central Toxic Keratopathy following Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Case Study. J Curr Ophthalmol 2022;34:352-6

How to cite this URL:
Mohammadpour M, Khorrami-Nejad M, Heirani M, Moshirfar M. Topical Minoxidil Solution-Induced Central Toxic Keratopathy following Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Case Study. J Curr Ophthalmol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 4];34:352-6. Available from: http://www.jcurrophthalmol.org/text.asp?2022/34/3/352/362461




  Introduction Top


Central toxic keratopathy (CTK) is an acute and painless focal corneal disorder.[1] CTK is typically defined as a noninflammatory corneal disease with clinical presentations of dense central or pericentral corneal opacity in the anterior to mid-stromal layer, remarkable corneal flattening, and late hyperopic shift.[2],[3] CTK was initially described in a case series after mechanical microkeratome-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in 1998.[4] The incidence of CTK is rare and estimated to be 0.016% after refractive surgeries.[1],[3] Several case studies claimed that the incidence of CTK is not exclusive to the mechanical microkeratome-assisted LASIK surgeries and has also developed after femtosecond LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), trans-PRK, and small incision lenticule extraction surgeries.[3],[5],[6],[7],[8] The incidence of CTK after procedures other than LASIK suggests that in contrast to previous clinical belief, the pathophysiology could not be related to the flap formation. The exact etiology of CTK remains uncertain; however, different inciting pathogeneses have been proposed, including intraoperative  Meibomian gland More Details secretions and photoactivation of povidone-iodine by the excimer laser.[1],[3] Furthermore, other studies report that toxic reactions due to nonsurgical elements such as contact lenses or idiopathic factors could result in stromal keratopathy mimicking CTK.[9],[10],[11] CTK usually occurs within 3–9 days after surgery.[1] The maximum hyperopic shift was observed approximately 1 month after refractive surgery and could be resolved gradually up to 2–18 months following the operation.[12] Because of the presumably self-limited and noninflammatory nature of CTK, Moshirfar et al. recommend an observational approach without therapeutic intervention.[1] Recent publication on CTK suggests that in some cases, irrigation of the stromal bed under the flap after femtosecond LASIK can enhance the recovery time of CTK but not the final visual outcome and prognosis.[7]

Minoxidil 5% is an over-the-counter topical solution for routine application to the scalp to stimulate hair growth in patients with androgenetic alopecia and as an adjunct therapy after hair transplant surgery. There are rare reports of ophthalmic side effects following routine use of topical minoxidil 5% solution.[13],[14] In this case report, we present the clinical findings of unilateral CTK after bilateral PRK in a patient whose left cornea was inadvertently exposed to topical minoxidil 5% solution on the 1st postoperative day. To our knowledge, this is the first report of presumed minoxidil-induced unilateral CTK after PRK.


  Case Report Top


A 27-year-old male who underwent PRK in June 2020 presented for removal of his bandage contact lenses 5 days after surgery. The patient reported exposure of his left eye (LE) to minoxidil solution (Pak Darou 5% Minoxidil solution) on the 1st postoperative day, with a significant burning sensation and irritation that resolved after several hours that day. He was on treatment for posthair transplant surgery with topical ethanol-based minoxidil 5% solution on the scalp once a day. According to the patient, the minoxidil solution inadvertently flowed into the LE. Informed consent for publication was obtained from this case.

On initial presentation, the uncorrected distance visual acuity of the right eye (RE) and LE was 20/25 and 20/200, respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) value was 20/25 for the RE and 20/50 for the LE. The patient attributed his vision reduction and increased irritation of the LE to the minoxidil exposure. Clinical examination revealed a compound hyperopic manifest refraction of +6.00/−5.00 × 45 in the LE and an insignificant refractive error in the RE. The preoperative manifest refraction of the LE was −3.00/−2.75 × 157 with the best CDVA of 20/20 and without any topographic signs of irregularity. On slit-lamp examination, the obvious finding was a central corneal opacity involving the stromal layer [Figure 1]a. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue RTVue-100; Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA), pachymetry map, and epithelial map recordings of the LE within the central 5 mm of corneal profile 5 days after PRK procedure are shown in [Figure 1]b. Irregularities in the epithelial map, central corneal thinning in the pachymetry map, and central flattening in the AS-OCT image are illustrated in [Figure 1]b. Examination findings were consistent with a diagnosis of CTK. The corresponding findings of the RE were within normal limits.
Figure 1: Central corneal opacity on slit-lamp imaging of the left eye (a), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography, pachymetry map, and epithelial map (b) 5 days after photorefractive keratectomy surgery

Click here to view


The patient was instructed to discontinue the future application of topical minoxidil. Furthermore, as topical steroids in such cases are controversial, the preprescribed dosage of fluorometholone eye drops was tapered in the LE. To prevent corneal apoptosis, lubricant eye drops, Vitamin C, and doxycycline were prescribed. Six months later, CDVA and refraction of the LE were 20/20 and +0.50 diopter, respectively, and the cornea was clear. [Figure 2]a illustrates the elimination of central corneal opacity 6 months after the presentation. [Figure 2]b shows the AS-OCT, pachymetry map, and epithelial map recordings of the LE 6 months after observation. The most remarkable changes of AS-OCT and topographic maps between 5-day and 6-month examinations are presented in [Table 1].
Figure 2: Slit-lamp imaging (a), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography, pachymetry map, and epithelial map (b) 6 months following photorefractive keratectomy surgery

Click here to view
Table 1: Changes in different corneal thickness values between 5 days and 6 months examinations

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


To the best of our knowledge, we present the first documented report of a patient who developed unilateral CTK due to corneal exposure to ethanol-containing minoxidil 5% hair solution following an uneventful bilateral PRK surgery. The case initially presented with classic manifestations of CTK, including noninflammatory central stromal opacification, corneal flattening, and hyperopic refractive shift with spontaneous resolution over time.[3] The diagnosis of CTK was established according to the findings on manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, and AS-OCT. It is noteworthy that we initially suspected exposure keratopathy according to the patient's self-report of exposure to an ethanol-containing solution. However, as exposure keratopathy is mainly associated with more intensive symptoms of ocular discomfort, corneal abrasion, and no hyperopic shift, we reasonably made the diagnosis of CTK.[15] We also ruled out other forms of corneal opacities following refractive surgeries according to the disorder characteristics as listed in [Table 2].[1]
Table 2: Differential diagnosis of postrefractive surgery corneal opacities

Click here to view


Minoxidil solution (Pak Darou 5% Minoxidil) contains 5% minoxidil and 47.2% ethanol (ethyl alcohol). Early studies on the postoperative effect of topical minoxidil as a medication for improving refractive outcomes after radial keratotomy and decreasing corneal haze after PRK advocated the enhancing effects of this agent by inhibiting keratocyte proliferation activity in the injured cornea.[16],[17] Ethanol is an agent that has been commonly used in ophthalmic surgeries such as alcohol-assisted PRK and pterygium excision for many years.[18],[19] The basic application of ethanol in ophthalmic surgeries is producing epithelial debridement that relates to its potential ability for epithelial cells to weaken. The most frequent dosage of ethanol in anterior segment surgeries is in the form of 20% diluted ethanol.[20] Previous studies reported that ethanol exposure at concentrations <20% over ocular surface for no more than 60 s seems to be risk-free.[18],[21] However, high-concentration ethanol-containing minoxidil products may impose an instant toxic effect on corneal epithelial cells due to the higher dosage of ethanol.[22] Despite therapeutic applications of ethanol in ophthalmic surgeries, few studies have investigated the toxic effects of ethanol on the corneal surface. As the minoxidil solution that has been administered by the patient contains high-dose ethanol (47.2%), it may impose apoptosis on the epithelial cells of the cornea.[20] In a study conducted by Oh et al.,[20] corneal epithelial cells in the culture were exposed to the different dosages of ethanol for 30 s. Following that, they analyzed the cytotoxicity reactions and the presence of inflammatory cytokines in the epithelial cells for the next 3 days. They found a decrease in the viability of whole epithelial cells that was due to apoptosis, and the induced response was dependent on the ethanol concentration. In addition, they found a remarkable increase in the appearance of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in epithelial and stromal cells of the exposed corneas. They concluded that short-time exposure to ethanol could exert prolonged effects on corneal surface due to disorganizing epithelial cells and concurrent inflammatory responses which both events could make ocular surface susceptible to many diseases. It has been previously postulated that toxic or immune reactions could be a risk factor in developing CTK after refractive surgeries.[1],[3],[12] Likewise, our case was unintentionally exposed to the ethanol-containing minoxidil solution as a cytotoxic factor that finally resulted in developing CTK.

Most of the previously reported CTK cases have occurred following LASIK.[2],[3] However, there are some reports of CTK development after other refractive surgery procedures,[3],[5],[6],[8] contact lens use,[9],[10] and idiopathic causes.[11] The current belief is that the exact cause of CTK remains a matter of debate.[2] Sonmez and Maloney postulated that toxic corneal response to external particles might be a risk factor in developing CTK.[3] Our case supports this hypothesis, as we observed that the corneal opacity resolved spontaneously after the patient's use of routine post-PRK medications. Early clinical signs of corneal inflammation or infection are conjunctival injection, stromal edema, and corneal infiltrations. In the next phase, the stromal layer may lose its tissue. In contrast, as shown in our case, CTK corneas are prone to stromal and epithelial thinning and anterior corneal flattening during the 1st days after the procedure without any concurrent inflammatory events.[1],[2],[3],[12] Previous reports of in vivo confocal microscopy proved the noninflammatory nature of CTK.[23],[24] These reports proposed that a cytokine apoptosis process without any inflammatory cells and necrotic debris could contribute to CTK onset.[23],[24] In general, the primary management strategies in CTK patients are using lubricants for relieving corneal irritation, metalloprotease inhibitors such as doxycycline, and medications that accelerate corneal wound healing such as ascorbic acid.[10]

Despite the uncertain etiology, CTK corneas generally have a fair-to-good prognosis for visual rehabilitation. As stated before, our patient achieved normal visual acuity at the final examination. We also observed that the stroma and epithelium continued thickening until 6 months after CTK. We believe that this is the first case report of a patient whose cornea was inadvertently exposed to ethanol-containing minoxidil that may have precipitated the development of CTK after PRK. Identification of the unique hallmarks of AS-OCT in this disease, including stromal opacification, epithelial thinning, and corneal flattening, could help the practitioner to make a proper diagnosis and outline the best-laid treatment plan. We conclude that the etiology of CTK is not limited to intraoperative problems or postoperative contact lens-related factors, and ethanol should be considered a possible risk factor for developing CTK after refractive surgeries. The use of ethanol-free agents may minimize the risk of corneal problems after refractive surgeries. It is recommended to warn patients who have undergone refractive surgeries to avoid high-dose ethanol-containing agents or be cautious in administering such agents because of the possibility of CTK, a complication not formally recognized. Further in vivo studies are needed to unveil the relationship between toxic environmental factors and CTK development.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Moshirfar M, Hazin R, Khalifa YM. Central toxic keratopathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010;21:274-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jutley G, Aiello F, Robaei D, Maurino V. Central toxic keratopathy after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1985-93.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sonmez B, Maloney RK. Central toxic keratopathy: Description of a syndrome in laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:420-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fraenkel GE, Cohen PR, Sutton GL, Lawless MA, Rogers CM. Central focal interface opacity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998;14:571-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Davey N, Aslanides IM, Selimis V. A case report of central toxic keratopathy in a patient post TransPRK (followed by corneal collagen cross-linking). Int Med Case Rep J 2017;10:131-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Koh K, Jun I, Kim TI, Kim EK, Seo KY. Central toxic keratopathy after small incision lenticule extraction. Korean J Ophthalmol 2020;34:254-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Moshirfar M, Hall MN, West WB Jr., McCabe SE, Miller CM, West DG, et al. Five-year occurrence and management of central toxic keratopathy after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 2021;37:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Neira W, Holopainen JM, Tervo TM. Long-term outcome of central toxic keratopathy after photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea 2011;30:1207-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Moshirfar M, Kurz C, Ghajarnia M. Contact lens-induced keratitis resembling central toxic keratopathy syndrome. Cornea 2009;28:1077-80.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ting DS, Ghosh S. Central toxic keratopathy after contact lens wear and mechanical debridement: Clinical characteristics, and visual and corneal tomographic outcomes. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:e15-23.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wagh VK, de Benito-Llopis L, O'Brart DP. Idiopathic stromal keratitis resembling central toxic keratopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:1523-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Marí Cotino JF, Suriano MM, De La Cruz Aguiló RI, Vila-Arteaga J. Central toxic keratopathy: A clinical case series. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:701-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Aktas H, Alan S, Türkoglu EB, Sevik Ö. Could topical minoxidil cause non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy? J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:WD01-2.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Scarinci F, Mezzana P, Pasquini P, Colletti M, Cacciamani A. Central chorioretinopathy associated with topical use of minoxidil 2% for treatment of baldness. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2012;31:157-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kousha O, Kousha Z, Paddle J. Exposure keratopathy: Incidence, risk factors and impact of protocolised care on exposure keratopathy in critically ill adults. J Crit Care 2018;44:413-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Goins KM, Karp KO, Gabrielian K. Minoxidil-induced alteration of corneal topography after radial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:612-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
McLeod SD, Alvi NP, Zhou L, Dave Y, Chandler JW, Fiscella R. The effect of minoxidil on keratocyte proliferation in cell culture. Ophthalmic Res 1998;30:263-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Chen KH, Hsu WM. Intraoperative ethanol treatment as an adjuvant therapy of pterygium excision. Int J Biomed Sci 2006;2:414-21.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mohammadpour M, Rezaei F, Heirani M, Khorrami-Nejad M. Comparison of postoperative symptoms of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical epithelial removal in photorefractive keratectomy: A contralateral double blind clinical trial. Eye Contact Lens 2021;47:655-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Oh JY, Yu JM, Ko JH. Analysis of ethanol effects on corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:3852-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Dreiss AK, Winkler von Mohrenfels C, Gabler B, Kohnen T, Marshall J, Lohmann CP. Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK): Histological investigation for vitality of corneal epithelial cells after alcohol exposure. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2002;219:365-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Liu HY, Yeh PT, Kuo KT, Huang JY, Lin CP, Hou YC. Toxic keratopathy following the use of alcohol-containing antiseptics in nonocular surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:449-52.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hau SC, Allan BD. In vivo confocal microscopy findings in central toxic keratopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:710-2.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Thornton IL, Foulks GN, Eiferman RA. Confocal microscopy of central toxic keratopathy. Cornea 2012;31:934-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed490    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded45    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]