| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 34
| Issue : 4 | Page : 409-413 |
|
|
Corneal biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus
Adel Hamid, Hamidreza Jahadi-Hosseini, Mohammad Reza Khalili, Hamidreza Jahanbani-Ardakani
Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Correspondence Address:
Hamidreza Jahadi-Hosseini
Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Zand Street, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/joco.joco_177_21
|
|
|
Purpose: To evaluate the changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea using the Corvis ST device after the treatment of keratoconus patients with ultraviolet-A/riboflavin corneal cross-linking (CXL).
Methods: Thirty-seven eyes from 37 consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus were included in this prospective observational case series. Corneal biomechanical parameters including the length of the applanated cornea (L1 and L2), corneal movement velocity during applanation (V1 and V2) at the moment of the first and second applanation, deformation amplitude (DA), distance between bending points of the cornea points of the cornea (PD), and concave radius of curvature (R) at the point of the highest concavity were recorded using the Corvis ST at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after CXL.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 23.27 years (range, 19–31 years). Among CorVis ST corneal biomechanical parameters, L1, DA, PD, and R at the point of the highest concavity did not change significantly. The length of the applanated cornea at the moment of second applanation (L2) showed a significant change 3 months after CXL, but no significant difference was found between the 3-month and 1-year values of this parameter. Corneal movement velocity during applanation (V1 and V2) did not change 3 months after doing CXL, but the changes in these parameters were significant 1 year after CXL.
Conclusions: Although the CorVis ST device may detect changes in some biomechanical properties of cornea after the treatment of keratoconus patients with CXL, many parameters remain unchanged, and this device cannot readily be used to find the effects of CXL.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
